Client Feedback
What Clients Say About Working with Khemloft
Honest feedback from businesses in Bangkok that used our advisory services for technology purchasing decisions.
Back to Home85+
Clients served
4.8
Average rating
6 yrs
In Bangkok market
70%
Return clients
Reviews
Client Experiences
Wanchai Pattanasri
Operations Manager, Bangkok
We came to Khemloft after two failed attempts at choosing a project management tool on our own. The session helped us articulate what had gone wrong each time — we'd been choosing based on interface rather than workflow fit. The criteria list they produced was genuinely useful. We chose a tool within three weeks and it's still working well eight months on.
May 2025 · Tool Selection Session
Siriporn Rojsatien
Finance Director, Pathum Wan
The vendor comparison work was thorough. They produced a template that made it clear how the four vendors we were considering actually differed on the criteria that mattered to us — not just on price. One minor thing: the engagement took a week longer than we expected, though the final recommendation was well-reasoned and our board accepted it without pushback.
April 2025 · Vendor Comparison Support
Noppadon Khemchan
CEO, Silom
We signed the annual advisory arrangement in early 2024 and have found it consistently useful. The main value for us is having someone to review vendor renewal proposals before we respond. Our CRM vendor tried to raise the contract by 30% at renewal — the Khemloft team helped us prepare a counteroffer that ended with a 5% increase instead. That alone covered the advisory fee.
May 2025 · Technology Vendor Advisory
Thitirat Luangsri
Head of Operations, Sathorn
What I appreciated most was the pace. We'd been spinning on this decision for months. The session forced us to make the criteria concrete, and once we had them written down the choice became fairly obvious. The written needs summary was also useful for onboarding the software vendor — we could hand it over and say "this is what we need from you."
April 2025 · Tool Selection Session
Pakorn Wattanapol
IT Lead, Rama IV
As the person responsible for evaluating tools in our team, I found the comparison template valuable — not because it told us things we didn't know, but because it organised the information in a way that non-technical colleagues could follow. The recommendation session was balanced. They didn't push us toward a particular option; they walked us through the trade-offs and let us decide.
May 2025 · Vendor Comparison Support
Jirapat Thongkum
Managing Director, Bangkok
We've been on the annual advisory since last year. It suits how our business works — we don't make big software decisions every month, but when one comes up it's useful to have someone to think through it with. The session notes are clean and concise. My team refers back to them when questions come up later in the year.
April 2025 · Technology Vendor Advisory
Case Studies
How Engagements Progressed
Case Study 01
Logistics firm — replacing a warehouse management tool
Challenge
A mid-sized logistics company in Bangkok needed to replace a warehouse management system that had outgrown its original scope. They had a list of six potential vendors, no agreed criteria, and a target go-live date that was creating internal pressure to decide quickly.
Approach
We ran a criteria alignment session with the operations, IT, and finance leads. This reduced the vendor list from six to three based on a set of agreed requirements — before any vendor demos had taken place. A structured comparison template was then used to assess the three shortlisted vendors consistently.
Outcome
A documented recommendation was delivered within eleven days. The client selected a vendor, negotiated a favourable implementation timeline, and went live on schedule. The criteria document was later used to evaluate a second software decision in a different department.
Case Study 02
Professional services firm — first software purchase
Challenge
A small consultancy in Silom was choosing its first dedicated CRM tool. The team had no prior experience with software purchasing and found vendor demonstrations confusing — each product appeared to meet their needs, making the choice feel arbitrary.
Approach
A Tool Selection Session clarified that the firm's primary need was visibility into follow-up activity, not full CRM functionality. This narrowed the category considerably. A short criteria list was produced, and the client used it to structure their own vendor conversations — without needing a formal comparison engagement.
Outcome
The firm selected a lighter-weight tool at a significantly lower price point than the enterprise CRM options they had initially been evaluating. The decision was made within two weeks of the session. The director noted that the session had saved them from "buying far more software than we actually needed."
Contact
Reach Us Directly
Phone
+66 2 254 9618Address
500 Ploenchit Road, Lumphini
Pathum Wan, Bangkok 10330
Hours
Mon–Fri: 9:00–18:00
Sat: by arrangement
Ready to add your own experience?
Get in touch with a brief description of the technology decision you're facing. We'll suggest the most suitable service.
Book a Session